I think this conclusion should be a no-brainer for anyone who takes the time to think about it. What is the primary function of business? On the most basic level, the function of business is to generate profit. Profit is good and necessary for any successful business. But, profit is a motive without conscience. When profit is the guiding force, higher human motives such as patriotism, fairness, social responsibility, loyalty, honesty, generosity, and kindness become subordinate.
What is the primary function of government? The function of government is to serve the citizenry. The US Constitution articulates this purpose very eloquently: "establish Justice (fairness), ensure domestic Tranquility (peace), provide for the common defense (protection), promote the general Welfare (social responsibility), and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity (protect the rights and freedoms of current and future generations of American citizens)."
Consider a hypothetical individual, modeled after business, who is motivated by personal profit to the exclusion of all other influences. This individual would be characterized as a sociopath and government would be charged with protecting the populous from him/her.
Now, consider a hypothetical individual, modeled after government, whose dominant motivators in life are to stand up for people who are being treated unfairly, to maintain social harmony, to protect those who are in danger, to share with those who are in need, and to support the freedoms and rights of all people. This person would be characterized as a hero.

This is not rocket science. When one’s moral compass is not compromised by base motives (greed, bigotry, selfishness, arrogance, clannishness, indifference to the suffering of others, cruelty, etc.), direction becomes clear and obvious.
Today's brand of conservative will never understand this. It contains far too much logic and reason.
ReplyDeleteHahahaha... heard that
Deletetoday's brand of conservative, or more to the point, individual human beings who subscribe to today's brand of conservatism, tend, like virtually all human beings, to reject even reason when it comes wrapped in a skin of moralistic condescension and intellectual superiority.
Deletetranslation: that attitude gets us nowhere positive.
Telling the truth is not being morally condescending or intellectually superior, it's just being honest.
DeleteLogic, reason and empathy lead to moral consistency. My read on the "individual human beings who subscribe to today's brand of conservatism" simply reject all opposing views without ever applying reason, logic, or empathy. When I post an argument that is supported by logic and objective data, I never get a conservative rebuttal that is substantiated by such support. Instead, I get purely fallacious responses. I will happily concede a point when I am presented with substantial opposing evidence. I form my opinions based on reason, objective evidence, and empathy. My Republican friends seem to take positions that "feel" right to them rather than positions supported by reason and evidence.
Delete